Web
Video's Search for the Holy Grail
OMMA
Magazine
by Steve
Smith, November 2007 issue
The
quest continues for hit shows and star power and the audience to sustain them
Have we
seen this episode before? The Digital Entertainment Network in 1999? Warner
Bros. "Entertaindom" portal of 2000? Last year's underwhelming
"Gold Rush?" series on AOL?
Recent
history is littered with failed attempts to generate serialized original
programming on the Web. Even high-profile producers like Mark "Gold
Rush" Burnett and Tim Burton (anyone remember "Stainboy"?) have
missed that long-sought proverbial grail: leverage cheap digital production and
distribution to offer niche audiences and advertisers alternative new media
properties. And yet the quest lives on - at MySpace's new 130-episode
"Afterworld" animated series and the upcoming "Quarterlife"
show, VuGuru's 80-episode murder mystery, "Prom Queen,"
"KateModern" (teen angst), "Goodnight Burbank" (media
satire) and scores more coming from countless digital studios. But does this
new run at the old "Webisodic" entertainment model really vault the
past hurdle of successfully aggregating loyal audiences advertisers want to
buy?
This time
around a critical mass of users are tuning, or clicking, into shows on the Web
in much the same way they do on TV, say defenders of the format. Eric Hadley,
the new CMO at Heavy.com says that ongoing shows like "Superficial
Friends" and "Behind the Music that Sucks" helped draw users to
the site. Average viewing time, he says, is a TV-like 22 minutes. "This is
not just any old video," he says. "This is regularly scheduled and
people come to watch it."
In fact,
raw numbers suggest that an audience is present at times for some Webisodic programming.
Michael Eisner's "Prom Queen" series claimed 15 million views by the
end of its first season, with up to 200,000 streams a day. A Will Ferrell skit
on FunnyorDie.com pulled 45 million views in five months. The infamous
Lonelygirl15 hoax (a series that chronicled the life of 15-year-old
"Bree," who turned out to be a fictional character played by actress
Jessica Rose) claimed 70 million views, and 13 million in the first two months
of spin-off "KateModern."
"With
100,000 [views] a month you are doing pretty well, and with 1 million a month
you can call yourself a hit," says Mike Hudack, CEO of Blip.tv, which
distributes the popular "Goodnight Burbank" and "Break a
Leg." He instructs wannabe digital moguls from the big book of Webisodic
failure: consistent look and feel and a regular schedule of new episodes are
critical to building show loyalty. His "Goodnight Burbank" just
secured a sponsorship from HBO. VuGuru's slick "Prom Queen" had
support from the film "Hairspray."
Lost in Cyberspace
Despite these spot successes, however, advertisers are waiting to see how a
reliable ecosystem might generate consistent audiences for original
Webertainment. "A lot of these Webisodics don't have much traffic - 2,000
to 5,000 streams a day," says Michael Shehan, CEO of video ad network
SpotXchange. "A lot won't make it."
The Web is
already brimming with clever content no one ever sees because distributors lack
the cross-promotion and marketing muscle that TV networks have traditionally
exercised. "Goodnight Burbank" may be great but how many people know
about it, asks Eric Bader, senior vice president and director of digital
connections at MediaVest. "The thing I worry about is the total leverage
that is available to promote them. It's not the quality or the ad opportunity;
it is just how much awareness can you possible drive?"
"I
think it has a better chance," says Lars Bastholm, executive creative
director at AKQA, because distribution mechanisms are now in place for good
content to surface and thrive. Social networks like MySpace and video hubs Veoh
and YouTube drove most of the traffic to "Prom Queen," for instance,
and iPods or phones now let users snack on mini-episodes anywhere. "You
aren't asking people to come to you; you are placing content where they already
are." The social networks may provide the syndication and promotion
machine online that TV networks built offline: persistent awareness, water
cooler discussion and new episode alerts.
Sponsors
on the Sidelines
Media buyers are
starting to imagine ways into the Webisodic flow this time around. At Starcom,
supervisor of the video activation team Samantha Tenicki says they are
"keeping a close eye on" the new breed of serial programming because
it offers select brands a place to experiment with online integration.
Lonelygirl15 recently placed Icebreakers Sours gum in episodes and cut a deal
with Neutrogena to turn a scientist character into a company employee. Bastholm
muses that someday there may be "an upfront for Web-only shows. Show a few
episodes and [a sponsor] comes on board to help them finance the rest."
But such a
development remains in the future. Though AOL this spring announced an
upfront-like "First Look" preview of online programming, the portal
hasn't come through with the shows and was asking up to $5 million in
commitments, according to press reports.
The real ad
value and underlying cost structures of original Web programming remain
unclear. Eisner has said publicly that VuGuru at least made back the
$100-150,000 it invested in "Prom Queen." But bootstrapped Web moguls
generally don't have the luxury of TV and film studio models where blockbusters
underwrite the failed experiments. "I will be curious to see if there is
enough scale for any of these things to cover the production costs," says
Brian Monahan, senior vice president, of Interpublic's Emerging Media Lab. Many
sponsors might prefer just getting into Webisodic production themselves.
"Fifteen million views of my branded entertainment is great," he
says. "Fifteen million impressions of my video ad is not."
Contributing
writer Steve Smith is a longtime new-media consultant and columnist, and
current editor of Digital Media Report for MinOnline.com and Mobile Media
Report for TelecomWeb.com Contact him at popeyesmith@comcast.net.
Link
to article